About ASBRAdvances in Social Behavior Research (ASBR) is an international peer reviewed journal hosted by Singapore International Management Research Centre (the governing body of NTU Nanyang Cultural Endowment Fund, Nanyang Technological University), published by EWA Publishing. ASBR is a monthly journal that publishes only original articles addressing social sciences, communication, education, psychology, politics, law and sports science issues from diverse methodological and disciplinary perspectives. The journal features research-oriented articles and welcomes both empirical and theoretical contributions focused on social activity and organizational behavior. Manuscripts suitable for publication in ASBR span a broad range of domains, including social sciences, communication, education, psychology, politics, law and sports science.For more details of the Jasbr scope, please refer to the Aim&Scope page. For more information about the journal, please refer to the FAQ page or contact info@ewapublishing.org. |
|
Aims & scope of ASBR are: |
Article processing charge
A one-time Article Processing Charge (APC) of 450 USD (US Dollars) applies to papers accepted after peer review. excluding taxes.
Open access policy
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. (CC BY 4.0 license).
Your rights
These licenses afford authors copyright while enabling the public to reuse and adapt the content.
Peer-review process
Our blind and multi-reviewer process ensures that all articles are rigorously evaluated based on their intellectual merit and contribution to the field.
Editors View full editorial board
Singapore
zhao0185@e.nut.edu.sg
Singapore
yufei.zhao@ntu.edu.sg
Nawabshah, Pakistan
abdullah.laghari@quest.edu.pk
Austin, USA
aquasia.shaw@austin.utexas.edu
Latest articles View all articles
This article examines the paradigm shift in the liability of China's commercial bank shareholders, from traditional company law-based limited liability towards a financial law-based principle of risk sharing. It addresses the inherent flaws and moral hazards of limited liability within the highly leveraged and systemically important banking sector. The analysis focuses on China's constructed system of enhanced obligations for bank shareholders, which bridges ex-ante constraints, such as stringent qualification reviews, consolidated supervision, and capital replenishment commitments, with ex-post accountability tools, including bail-in conversions and rules requiring shareholders to bear losses first. Empirical validation comes from cases like Baoshang Bank, while comparative analysis with the U.S. Source of Strength doctrine and the EU's resolution framework supports this shift's legitimacy. The article identifies operational issues within China's current legal mechanism, including ambiguous regulatory boundaries, inadequate judicial relief, and poor coordination with the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law. It concludes by proposing normative improvements: clarifying liability triggers, emphasizing procedural justice, and enhancing legal coordination to advance the legalization of bank governance and risk resolution in China.
The suicide of the truck driver Jin De Qiang in 2021 following a penalty for Beidou navigation disconnection sparked widespread public discussion on social media. This study analyses a selection of Sina Weibo posts collected in a dataset organised by Fu et al. [1] regarding Jin's incidence to examine public attitudes and their emotional tendencies towards this societal event. Bar graphs were used to assess relationships between multiple aspects of language choice and public attitudes, while word clouds were constructed for word frequency. The results suggest that overall the public was critical of the rigid Beidou policies and was sympathetic towards Jin. Such voices on social media platforms demonstrates their increasingly pivotal role as a channel for public expression, reflecting their opinions and acting as a platform of social monitoring. In addition, this study uses Jin's incidence as a case to discuss working conditions of logistics workers in China overall. Their systemic societal vulnerability, including physical, psychological, and financial vulnerability was highlighted and analysed, while also referencing to recent changes that demonstrates or may lead to an improvement of their working conditions.
This qualitative study examines the process of continuous Japanese language learning among Chinese care workers, focusing on factors that promote or hinder sustained learning. Using a case study of one Chinese care worker, A, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using the Trajectory Equifinality Approach (TEA). The findings show that A's learning motivation shifted over time, influenced by factors such as career development and support from family and peers. The study also highlights the multi-layered nature of learning motivation.
This study, grounded in a Marxist “technology–institution–value” three-dimensional analytical framework, examines the internal mechanisms and collaborative pathways through which artificial intelligence (AI) can empower the construction of a China–Cambodia community of shared future. The research finds that, although preliminary coordination exists between China and Cambodia in technological complementarity, institutional frameworks, and value alignment, several challenges persist. These include technological bottlenecks such as weak infrastructure, limited data resources, and a lack of innovation ecosystems; institutional barriers including misaligned laws and regulations, fragmented supervision, and difficulties in standard harmonization; as well as value-related gaps such as differences in cultural perceptions, fragile foundations of mutual trust, and insufficient social participation. To address these challenges, three strategic pathways—technological coordination, institutional alignment, and value consensus—are proposed to build a systematic solution structured around “foundational support–institutional guarantees–social integration.” This framework provides theoretical guidance for China–Cambodia AI cooperation and offers insights for innovating digital collaboration models within the Belt and Road Initiative.
Volumes View all volumes
Announcements View all announcements
Advances in Social Behavior Research
We pledge to our journal community:
We're committed: we put diversity and inclusion at the heart of our activities...
Advances in Social Behavior Research
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal Advances in Social Behavior Research (ASBR) are solely those of the individual authors and contributors...
Indexing
The published articles will be submitted to following databases below: