Against the backdrop of the rapid expansion of the digital economy, cross-border data flows have become the core foundation for the development of digital trade. As a key institutional instrument for countries to balance data security and privacy protection, data localization measures increasingly conflict with international trade rules. These conflicts not only hinder the smooth progress of global digital trade but have also emerged as a central issue in global digital governance, attracting broad attention from governments, international organizations, and academia. Taking the legal nature of data localization measures as its logical starting point, this paper conducts a systematic analysis of the regulatory conflicts between such measures and digital trade within the framework of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and regional trade agreements such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). It explores the specific manifestations and impacts of these conflicts under different trade scenarios, while also mapping the diverse characteristics of data governance models across countries and regions. Through a comparative study of the data governance philosophies, legal systems, and policy practices of major economies—including the United States, the European Union, and China—the paper proposes a coordination path for resolving such conflicts based on the principle of technological neutrality and the “principle-plus-exception” framework. The findings of this study not only enrich the theoretical system of global digital trade governance but also provide important theoretical and practical references for China’s active participation in the formulation of international digital trade rules, the enhancement of its discourse power in global digital governance, and the promotion of the healthy and orderly development of its digital trade.
Research Article
Open Access